跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究二元寿命回归与删失数据,聚类寿命观测本身不足以证明属于面板数据或其他所列方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Wenqing He
Jerald F. Lawless

回归分析中的二元位置—尺度模型及寿命数据应用

研究问题
二元位置—尺度回归相较分别拟合单变量模型有何效率收益,联合分布误设时,完整与删失数据的估计有何不同?
方法与思路
作者研究位置—尺度模型中最大似然估计的一致性与效率,结合删失情形的模拟,并以糖尿病视网膜病变研究数据说明。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称完整数据下回归系数估计在联合分布误设时仍一致,而删失数据下不再一致;模拟显示许多所考察情形偏差较小。
阅读关注点
应核对完整数据下误设稳健性所需条件、删失机制和效率比较标准,以及模拟中偏差较小的情形及真实应用设定。
阅读边界
仅据 Crossref 摘要;具体一致性条件、效率结果和偏差数值未提供,不能将模拟中的小偏差概括为一般稳健性。

原文摘要

Summary The literature on multivariate linear regression includes multivariate normal models, models that are used in survival analysis and a variety of models that are used in other areas such as econometrics. The paper considers the class of location–scale models, which includes a large proportion of the preceding models. It is shown that, for complete data, the maximum likelihood estimators for regression coefficients in a linear location–scale framework are consistent even when the joint distribution is misspecified. In addition, gains in efficiency arising from the use of a bivariate model, as opposed to separate univariate models, are studied. A major area of application for multivariate regression models is to clustered, ‘parallel’ lifetime data, so we also study the case of censored responses. Estimators of regression coefficients are no longer consistent under model misspecification, but we give simulation results that show that the bias is small in many practical situations. Gains in efficiency from bivariate models are also examined in the censored data setting. The methodology in the paper is illustrated by using lifetime data from the Diabetic Retinopathy Study.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文