Bivariate Location–Scale Models for Regression Analysis, with Applications to Lifetime Data
回归分析中的二元位置—尺度模型及寿命数据应用AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究二元寿命回归与删失数据,聚类寿命观测本身不足以证明属于面板数据或其他所列方向。
回归分析中的二元位置—尺度模型及寿命数据应用AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Summary The literature on multivariate linear regression includes multivariate normal models, models that are used in survival analysis and a variety of models that are used in other areas such as econometrics. The paper considers the class of location–scale models, which includes a large proportion of the preceding models. It is shown that, for complete data, the maximum likelihood estimators for regression coefficients in a linear location–scale framework are consistent even when the joint distribution is misspecified. In addition, gains in efficiency arising from the use of a bivariate model, as opposed to separate univariate models, are studied. A major area of application for multivariate regression models is to clustered, ‘parallel’ lifetime data, so we also study the case of censored responses. Estimators of regression coefficients are no longer consistent under model misspecification, but we give simulation results that show that the bias is small in many practical situations. Gains in efficiency from bivariate models are also examined in the censored data setting. The methodology in the paper is illustrated by using lifetime data from the Diabetic Retinopathy Study.