跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究平稳时间序列、频域似然、谱散度与自回归近似,属于时间序列方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Suhasini Subba Rao
Junho Yang

协调高斯似然与 Whittle 似然:频域估计的应用

研究问题
二阶平稳时间序列的高斯似然与 Whittle 似然为何不同,能否解释这种差异并据此改进频域估计准则?
方法与思路
作者构造与离散傅里叶变换双正交的变换,得到 Toeplitz 矩阵逆的新分解,再用有限阶自回归参数近似似然差异。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称推导了两种似然之间的精确界,将差异联系到遗漏的观测区间外线性预测,并提出两种新的频域拟似然准则。
阅读关注点
应核对界的成立条件、区间外预测的具体作用、自回归阶数选择,以及新准则逼近谱散度的条件与模拟比较指标。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;更好逼近和有限样本表现是作者陈述,摘要未提供具体条件与数值,不能推断普遍优势。

原文摘要

In time series analysis there is an apparent dichotomy between time and frequency domain methods. The aim of this paper is to draw connections between frequency and time domain methods. Our focus will be on reconciling the Gaussian likelihood and the Whittle likelihood. We derive an exact, interpretable, bound between the Gaussian and Whittle likelihood of a second order stationary time series. The derivation is based on obtaining the transformation which is biorthogonal to the discrete Fourier transform of the time series. Such a transformation yields a new decomposition for the inverse of a Toeplitz matrix and enables the representation of the Gaussian likelihood within the frequency domain. We show that the difference between the Gaussian and Whittle likelihood is due to the omission of the best linear predictions outside the domain of observation in the periodogram associated with the Whittle likelihood. Based on this result, we obtain an approximation for the difference between the Gaussian and Whittle likelihoods in terms of the best fitting, finite order autoregressive parameters. These approximations are used to define two new frequency domain quasi-likelihood criteria. We show that these new criteria can yield a better approximation of the spectral divergence criterion, as compared to both the Gaussian and Whittle likelihoods. In simulations, we show that the proposed estimators have satisfactory finite sample properties.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文