跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要的核心目标是对事件发生时间的分布函数进行非参数估计与精度比较。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
L. C. Petito
N. P. Jewell

存在误分类的混合检测现状数据

研究问题
当只能观察筛查时点前是否已发生事件,且混合检测存在误分类时,如何非参数估计事件发生时间的分布?
方法与思路
作者构造基于混合检测现状数据的分布函数估计量,与逐人检测的非参数极大似然估计量比较,并应用于丙肝发病年龄。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称存在误分类且 F(t) 较低时,混合检测估计可能更精确,并展示了美国特定产妇样本中的发病年龄曲线应用。
阅读关注点
应核对误分类机制、筛查时间变异与分布识别范围、组规模及分组规则,以及精度比较成立的具体条件。
阅读边界
摘要先后以 k 表示组数和组规模,需查原文确认记号;精度优势仅在所述情形下可能成立,误分类参数如何获得未说明。

原文摘要

Group testing, introduced by Dorfman (1943), has been used to reduce costs when estimating the prevalence of a binary characteristic based on a screening test of $k$ groups that include $n$ independent individuals in total. If the unknown prevalence is low and the screening test suffers from misclassification, it is also possible to obtain more precise prevalence estimates than those obtained from testing all $n$ samples separately (Tu et al., 1994). In some applications, the individual binary response corresponds to whether an underlying time-to-event variable $T$ is less than an observed screening time $C$, a data structure known as current status data. Given sufficient variation in the observed $C$ values, it is possible to estimate the distribution function $F$ of $T$ nonparametrically, at least at some points in its support, using the pool-adjacent-violators algorithm (Ayer et al., 1955). Here, we consider nonparametric estimation of $F$ based on group-tested current status data for groups of size $k$ where the group tests positive if and only if any individual’s unobserved $T$ is less than the corresponding observed $C$. We investigate the performance of the group-based estimator as compared to the individual test nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator, and show that the former can be more precise in the presence of misclassification for low values of $F(t)$. Potential applications include testing for the presence of various diseases in pooled samples where interest focuses on the age-at-incidence distribution rather than overall prevalence. We apply this estimator to the age-at-incidence curve for hepatitis C infection in a sample of U.S. women who gave birth to a child in 2014, where group assignment is done at random and based on maternal age. We discuss connections to other work in the literature, as well as potential extensions.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文