Misclassified group-tested current status data
存在误分类的混合检测现状数据AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要的核心目标是对事件发生时间的分布函数进行非参数估计与精度比较。
存在误分类的混合检测现状数据AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Group testing, introduced by Dorfman (1943), has been used to reduce costs when estimating the prevalence of a binary characteristic based on a screening test of $k$ groups that include $n$ independent individuals in total. If the unknown prevalence is low and the screening test suffers from misclassification, it is also possible to obtain more precise prevalence estimates than those obtained from testing all $n$ samples separately (Tu et al., 1994). In some applications, the individual binary response corresponds to whether an underlying time-to-event variable $T$ is less than an observed screening time $C$, a data structure known as current status data. Given sufficient variation in the observed $C$ values, it is possible to estimate the distribution function $F$ of $T$ nonparametrically, at least at some points in its support, using the pool-adjacent-violators algorithm (Ayer et al., 1955). Here, we consider nonparametric estimation of $F$ based on group-tested current status data for groups of size $k$ where the group tests positive if and only if any individual’s unobserved $T$ is less than the corresponding observed $C$. We investigate the performance of the group-based estimator as compared to the individual test nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator, and show that the former can be more precise in the presence of misclassification for low values of $F(t)$. Potential applications include testing for the presence of various diseases in pooled samples where interest focuses on the age-at-incidence distribution rather than overall prevalence. We apply this estimator to the age-at-incidence curve for hepatitis C infection in a sample of U.S. women who gave birth to a child in 2014, where group assignment is done at random and based on maternal age. We discuss connections to other work in the literature, as well as potential extensions.