跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究遗传连锁中的贝叶斯混合模型与基因定位,未提供与所列经济计量领域细分直接对应的证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Swati Biswas
Shili Lin

在遗传连锁分析中纳入不同异质性水平的贝叶斯方法

研究问题
当不同家系具有不同的遗传连锁概率时,如何放松共同混合参数的限制,同时判断是否存在连锁并定位疾病基因?
方法与思路
作者为每个家系设置异质性参数,在贝叶斯框架中使用可逆跳跃 MCMC 切换连锁与无连锁模型,计算后验概率及贝叶斯因子。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法给出基因位置及可信集合,推导估计量的联合渐近分布,并报告在误报率相近时具有更高的连锁检测能力。
阅读关注点
应核对家系特定参数的先验与可识别性、模型切换算法,以及检测能力比较的模拟设定、误报率控制和应用证据。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;先验、渐近条件及比较数值未说明,不能把摘要所述检测优势推广到其他遗传研究。

原文摘要

A widely used approach for dealing with locus heterogeneity in linkage analysis is based on mixture likelihood, in which a single mixing (heterogeneity) parameter represents the probability that each family is of linked type. However, in general, different types of families exhibit different heterogeneity levels. To incorporate this variability, we propose a new approach wherein each family has its own heterogeneity parameter representing the probability that it is of linked type. These parameters are nuisance parameters, whereas the main parameter of interest is the location of the disease gene, if there is any. We model the problem in the Bayesian framework and implement it using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methodology. In particular, we use the reversible-jump MCMC sampler to move between the two models: linkage and no linkage. We first estimate the posterior probability of linkage on a chromosome and the corresponding Bayes factor. If linkage is inferred, then the location of the disease gene along with its credible set is estimated. The asymptotic joint distribution of the estimators is derived. We show that this approach is more powerful than the currently used approach in detecting linkage, whereas the two approaches have comparable false-positive rates. The proposed method was applied to a lung cancer dataset of Genetic Epidemiology of Lung Cancer Consortium and an asthma dataset consisting of three samples from Genetic Analysis Workshop 12. Since both lung cancer and asthma are complex traits with heterogeneous genetic predisposition, they provide suitable applications for the proposed method.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文