Contrasts under Long-Range Correlations
长程相关下的对比统计量AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接讨论观测序列的长程依赖及其对统计推断的影响,对应时间序列方向。
反馈分类问题长程相关下的对比统计量AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The background of the paper is the empirical observation from a variety of subject areas that long-range correlations appear to be much more frequent than has been previously assumed. This includes high-quality measurement series which are commonly treated as prototypes of "i.i.d." observations. Evidence is briefly cited in the paper. It has already been shown elsewhere that long-range dependence leads to results that can be qualitatively different from those obtained under short-range dependence, and in particular, that long-range dependence has drastic effects on the naive statistical treatment of absolute constants. The natural question arising from this, also of relevance for statistical practice, is how the long-range dependence affects the statistics for contrasts. The main answer given in this paper is twofold. (i) If the experimental conditions are well mixed as provided by randomization, the levels of tests and confidence intervals derived under the independence assumption are still correct, asymptotically and usually in good approximation for finite samples. (ii) Even under randomly mixed designs there are typically large unnoticed power and efficiency losses due to the long-range dependence. They can be greatly reduced without estimating the correlations by a simple blocking device.