跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究调查抽样中的稳健总体均值估计,未明确对应所列计量细分领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jean-Philippe Gwet
Louis-Paul Rivest

比率估计量的抗离群值替代方法

研究问题
在存在离群值的抽样调查中,如何利用辅助信息稳健估计总体均值,并衡量传统比率估计与替代方法的偏差和方差取舍?
方法与思路
作者以过原点回归斜率的M或GM估计构造抗离群值比率估计,分析抽样随机化下的渐近性质、条件偏差,并开展模拟比较。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,抗离群值估计的条件偏差较稳定,在两个模拟总体中可明显降低均方误差;论文还提出均方误差估计并讨论置信区间。
阅读关注点
应核对抽样设计、离群值机制、M与GM估计的选择,以及条件和无条件偏差的区别、均方误差估计与区间构造的有效性。
阅读边界
仅据OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明。模拟收益限定于所考察总体;摘要明确存在偏差与方差取舍,不能声称替代方法无偏或普遍占优。

原文摘要

Many techniques have been suggested to lower the impact of outliers on sample survey estimates. Outliers can be downweighted by winsorization; that is, by replacing extreme data points by a data-dependent or a predetermined value before calculating estimates. Another approach is to reduce the weight of outliers, from the inverse sampling fraction to 1, in the estimation of population characteristics. In this article the problem of estimating the population mean using auxiliary information in the presence of outliers is considered. A resistant version of the ratio estimator is introduced. It is constructed with a M or a GM estimator of the slope of the regression model through the origin, which is implicitly called on when considering the ratio estimator. The asymptotic biases and asymptotic variances of the proposed alternatives to the ratio estimator are calculated with respect to the randomization of the sampling plan. The selection of a resistant estimator is seen to involve a trade-off between bias and variance. Often, some bias is the price paid to reduce the variance. A mean squared error estimator is proposed. A model-based estimator proposed by Chambers, reducing the weights given to extreme observations to 1, is also studied. A conditional investigation of the bias, given the proportion of outliers in the sample, is carried out. It reveals that the unconditional unbiasedness of the ratio estimator is, in the presence of outliers, deceptive. Its conditional bias varies substantially with the difference between the sample proportion and the population proportion of outliers. It can be severe if the proportion of outliers in the sample is much larger than in the population. The conditional bias of resistant estimators is, on the other hand, more stable. It does not depend as much on the proportion of outliers in the sample. Monte Carlo comparisons of the ratio estimator with resistant alternatives are presented for two populations. These similations show that in the presence of outliers, the mean squared error of resistant estimators can be substantially smaller than that of the ratio estimator. They also show that resistant confidence intervals are interesting alternatives to intervals based on the ratio estimator.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文