跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般线性工具变量模型的识别稳健检验,未指定因果设计、经济结构模型或其他给定细分领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

条件异方差下线性工具变量回归的强功效子向量 Anderson–Rubin 检验

研究问题
在线性工具变量模型中,如何对部分结构参数实施双侧检验,同时应对任意工具变量强度与条件异方差?
方法与思路
作者先在协方差矩阵近似 Kronecker 乘积结构下改造已有检验,再依据模型选择结果切换至异方差稳健的 AR/AR 检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新检验的渐近尺寸不超过名义水平;当协方差结构距近似 Kronecker 形式不远时,模拟显示功效改善。
阅读关注点
应核对结构判别与检验切换规则、数据依赖临界值、尺寸控制覆盖的参数空间,以及功效改善所依赖的结构距离。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,不能断言任意异方差下均有功效优势,也无法核验具体尺寸条件或其他版本变化。

原文摘要

We introduce a new test for a two-sided hypothesis involving a subset of the structural parameter vector in the linear instrumental variables (IVs) model. Guggenberger, Kleibergen, and Mavroeidis (2019, Quantitative Economics , 10, 487–526; hereafter GKM19) introduce a subvector Anderson–Rubin (AR) test with data-dependent critical values that has asymptotic size equal to nominal size for a parameter space that allows for arbitrary strength or weakness of the IVs and has uniformly nonsmaller power than the projected AR test studied in Guggenberger et al. (2012, Econometrica , 80(6), 2649–2666). However, GKM19 imposes the restrictive assumption of conditional homoskedasticity (CHOM). The main contribution here is to robustify the procedure in GKM19 to arbitrary forms of conditional heteroskedasticity. We first adapt the method in GKM19 to a setup where a certain covariance matrix has an approximate Kronecker product (AKP) structure which nests CHOM. The new test equals this adaptation when the data are consistent with AKP structure as decided by a model selection procedure. Otherwise, the test equals the AR/AR test in Andrews (2017, Identification-Robust Subvector Inference , Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 3005, Yale University) that is fully robust to conditional heteroskedasticity but less powerful than the adapted method. We show theoretically that the new test has asymptotic size bounded by the nominal size and document improved power relative to the AR/AR test in a wide array of Monte Carlo simulations when the covariance matrix is not too far from AKP.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文