Exploring causal effects of hormone- and radio-treatments in an observational study of breast cancer using copula-based semi-competing risks models
以 Copula 半竞争风险模型研究乳腺癌激素治疗与放疗的因果效应AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将观察性治疗效应的因果推断和未测量因素敏感性分析作为目标,直接对应因果推断方向。
以 Copula 半竞争风险模型研究乳腺癌激素治疗与放疗的因果效应AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Breast cancer patients may experience relapse or death after surgery during the follow-up period, leading to dependent censoring of relapse. This phenomenon, known as semi-competing risk, imposes challenges in analyzing treatment effects on breast cancer and necessitates advanced statistical tools for unbiased analysis. Despite progress in estimation and inference within semi-competing risks regression, its application to causal inference is still in its early stages. This article aims to propose a frequentist and semi-parametric framework based on copula models that can facilitate valid causal inference, net quantity estimation and interpretation, and sensitivity analysis for unmeasured factors under right-censored semi-competing risks data. We also propose novel procedures to enhance parameter estimation and its applicability in real practice. After that, we apply the proposed framework to a breast cancer study and detect the time-varying causal effects of hormone- and radio-treatments on patients' relapse-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, extensive numerical evaluations demonstrate the method's feasibility, highlighting minimal estimation bias and reliable statistical inference.
翻转干预下的纵向加权与修剪处理效应
Weighting and trimming are popular methods for addressing positivity violations in causal inference. While well-studied with single-timepoint data, standard methods do not easily generalize to longitudinal data and remain vulnerable to time-varying positivity violations. We extend weighting and trimming to longitudinal settings via stochastic “flip” interventions, which maintain the treatment status of subjects who would have received the target treatment, and flip others’…
时变调节效应的选择后推断
Causal effect moderation investigates how the effect of interventions (or treatments) on outcome variables changes based on observed characteristics of individuals, known as potential effect moderators. With advances in data collection, datasets containing many observed features as potential moderators have become increasingly common. High-dimensional analyses often lack interpretability, with important moderators masked by noise, while low-dimensional, marginal analyses…
纵向修正治疗政策对健康结局变化率的效应估计
Longitudinal data often contains outcomes measured at multiple visits, and scientific interest may lie in quantifying the effect of an intervention on an outcome's rate of change. For example, one may wish to study the progression (or trajectory) of a disease over time under different hypothetical interventions. We extend the longitudinal modified treatment policy (LMTP) methodology to estimate effects of complex, exposure-dependent interventions on rates of change in an…
连续时变处理下边际结构模型的非参数有效估计
Summary Marginal structural models are a popular method for estimating causal effects in the presence of time-varying exposures. In spite of their popularity, no scalable nonparametric estimator exists for marginal structural models with multi-valued or continuous time-varying treatments. In this paper, we combine flexible, data-adaptive regression methods, including ensemble learning techniques, with recent developments in semiparametric efficiency theory for longitudinal…
条件可分离效应的近端因果推断
Abstract Scientists regularly pose questions about treatment effects on outcomes conditional on a posttreatment event. However, causal inference in such settings requires care, even in perfectly executed randomized experiments. Recently, the conditional separable effect (CSE) was proposed as an interventionist estimand that corresponds to scientifically meaningful questions in these settings. However, existing results for the CSE require no unmeasured confounding between the…
条件可分离效应的近端因果推断
Scientists regularly pose questions about treatment effects on outcomes conditional on a post-treatment event. However, causal inference in such settings requires care, even in perfectly executed randomized experiments. Recently, the conditional separable effect (CSE) was proposed as an interventionist estimand that corresponds to scientifically meaningful questions in these settings. However, existing results for the CSE require no unmeasured confounding between the outcome…