跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确使用含噪高频股票数据,检验日内波动率的确定性周期与剩余随机变化,直接对应高频计量和波动率方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kim Christensen
Ulrich Hounyo
Mark Podolskij

日内周期模式足以解释波动率变化吗?一项非参数评估

研究问题
研究高频金融数据中的日内波动变化是否完全由确定性、重复出现的日内周期模式解释,还是仍存在随机波动来源。
方法与思路
作者对收益去除日内周期成分,结合预平均、双幂变差与跳跃截断构造检验,并针对小幅无限活动跳跃提出自助推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,论文建立统计量的中心极限定理及协方差估计,证明替换日内因子不改变渐近理论;股票应用仍发现剩余异方差。
阅读关注点
应核对噪声与跳跃条件、日内因子估计和原假设定义,尤其检查小幅无限活动跳跃为何扭曲检验及自助修正的依据。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,日内模式解释的具体比例和检验大小数值未说明;小幅无限活动跳跃会造成扭曲,自助改善不能无限推广。

原文摘要

In this paper, we propose a nonparametric way to test the hypothesis that time-variation in intraday volatility is caused solely by a deterministic and recurrent diurnal pattern. We assume that noisy high-frequency data from a discretely sampled jump–diffusion process are available. The test is then based on asset returns, which are deflated by the seasonal component and therefore homoskedastic under the null. To construct our test statistic, we extend the concept of pre-averaged bipower variation to a general Itô semimartingale setting via a truncation device. We prove a central limit theorem for this statistic and construct a positive semi-definite estimator of the asymptotic covariance matrix. The t-statistic (after pre-averaging and jump-truncation) diverges in the presence of stochastic volatility and has a standard normal distribution otherwise. We show that replacing the true diurnal factor with a model-free jump- and noise-robust estimator does not affect the asymptotic theory. A Monte Carlo simulation also shows this substitution has no discernable impact in finite samples. The test is, however, distorted by small infinite-activity price jumps. To improve inference, we propose a new bootstrap approach, which leads to almost correctly sized tests of the null hypothesis. We apply the developed framework to a large cross-section of equity high-frequency data and find that the diurnal pattern accounts for a rather significant fraction of intraday variation in volatility, but important sources of heteroskedasticity remain present in the data.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文