跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论观察性因果推断、高维混杂调整和暴露效应估计,并比较 AIPW 与 TMLE,直接属于因果推断方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ashley I. Naimi
Qianhui Jin
Ya-Hui Yu
Sara M. Parisi
Lisa M. Bodnar

作为观察数据效应估计工具的残差对残差回归

研究问题
在高维混杂调整和弱重叠情形下,残差对残差回归能否稳定估计部分线性模型中的暴露效应,并辅助观察性因果分析?
方法与思路
作者分别拟合给定混杂变量的结果与暴露模型,再用普通最小二乘回归两组残差,并与 AIPW、TMLE 进行应用和模拟比较。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在效应近似恒定或由部分线性模型表达的模拟中,该方法具有较好偏差和覆盖表现;孕期数据应用中三种方法估计一致。
阅读关注点
应核对残差回归对应的效应参数、混杂调整与重叠条件、是否采用交叉拟合,以及异质性下与其他方法是否估计同一对象。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审或期刊接收未核实;摘要中的稳定性结论依赖模拟设定,不能推断该方法普遍解决重叠不足。

原文摘要

Epidemiologists increasingly use machine learning to adjust for high-dimensional confounding. Augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) and targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) are most widely used but may yield different results and both can become unstable under weak positivity violations. Residual-on-residual regression is a stable alternative that estimates an exposure effect encoded in a partially linear model by fitting confounder adjusted models for the outcome and exposure, then regressing outcome residuals against exposure residuals using ordinary least squares. We illustrate the approach using data from the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nuMoM2b; $n = 7{,}923$), estimating the association between high vegetable intake density and preeclampsia. Residual-on-residual regression, AIPW, and TMLE yielded concordant estimates, indicating a modest reduction in preeclampsia risk. In simulations, residual-on-residual regression was unbiased with near-nominal confidence interval coverage, performing comparably to AIPW and TMLE and substantially better than a misspecified parametric model when the exposure effect is approximately constant. However, in simulation settings with positivity violations, residual on residual regression outperformed AIPW and TMLE when the true effect was coded in a partially linear model. When the exposure effect is approximately constant, residual-on-residual regression is interpretable, computationally simple, and provides a triangulation strategy for observational causal inference.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文