跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确围绕因果发现、干预效应查询及主动实验设计建立贝叶斯框架,直接对应因果推断,未提供其他细分领域的依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Christian Toth
Lars Lorch
Christian Knoll
Andreas Krause
Franz Pernkopf
Robert Peharz

主动贝叶斯因果推断

研究问题
当目标只涉及特定因果查询时,如何避免先完整学习因果图再估计效应的两阶段成本,并有效利用主动收集的干预数据?
方法与思路
作者在因果充分的非线性加性噪声模型中使用高斯过程,联合推断因果模型与目标查询的后验,并顺序选择信息量最大的实验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该框架在模拟中比仅学习完整因果图的若干基准更节省数据,能以较少样本学习目标查询并提供校准的不确定性估计。
阅读关注点
应核对因果充分性和加性噪声假设、目标查询的信息准则、实验选择的可计算性,以及后验近似与不确定性校准的验证方式。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审或期刊接收未经核实;摘要中的效率和校准结论来自模拟,未说明潜在混杂下的适用性。

原文摘要

Causal discovery and causal reasoning are classically treated as separate and consecutive tasks: one first infers the causal graph, and then uses it to estimate causal effects of interventions. However, such a two-stage approach is uneconomical, especially in terms of actively collected interventional data, since the causal query of interest may not require a fully-specified causal model. From a Bayesian perspective, it is also unnatural, since a causal query (e.g., the causal graph or some causal effect) can be viewed as a latent quantity subject to posterior inference -- other unobserved quantities that are not of direct interest (e.g., the full causal model) ought to be marginalized out in this process and contribute to our epistemic uncertainty. In this work, we propose Active Bayesian Causal Inference (ABCI), a fully-Bayesian active learning framework for integrated causal discovery and reasoning, which jointly infers a posterior over causal models and queries of interest. In our approach to ABCI, we focus on the class of causally-sufficient, nonlinear additive noise models, which we model using Gaussian processes. We sequentially design experiments that are maximally informative about our target causal query, collect the corresponding interventional data, and update our beliefs to choose the next experiment. Through simulations, we demonstrate that our approach is more data-efficient than several baselines that only focus on learning the full causal graph. This allows us to accurately learn downstream causal queries from fewer samples while providing well-calibrated uncertainty estimates for the quantities of interest.

笔记与分组