跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究临床生存预测,未提供归入宏观预测或金融风险等给定领域细分的依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Layla Parast
Su-Chun Cheng
Tianxi Cai

纳入短期事件时间信息的长期生存 Landmark 预测

研究问题
如何结合存在删失的短期事件时间与多个协变量预测长期生存,并避免严格多状态参数模型和高维非参数估计的限制?
方法与思路
作者将 landmark 时点前收集的信息纳入灵活变系数模型,再用不要求该模型正确设定的非参数程序评价预测表现。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所提程序在模拟中具有良好有限样本表现,并以透析后终末期肾病患者数据展示长期生存预测。
阅读关注点
应核对 landmark 风险集和信息窗口、删失处理方式,以及预测性能评价为何不要求变系数模型正确设定。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;不能推断刊本变化。稳健评价不保证预测模型正确,摘要未给具体指标、删失假设或比较数值。

原文摘要

In recent years, a wide range of markers have become available as potential tools to predict risk or progression of disease. In addition to such biological and genetic markers, short term outcome information may be useful in predicting long term disease outcomes. When such information is available, it would be desirable to combine this along with predictive markers to improve the prediction of long term survival. Most existing methods for incorporating censored short term event information in predicting long term survival focus on modeling the disease process and are derived under restrictive parametric models in a multi-state survival setting. When such model assumptions fail to hold, the resulting prediction of long term outcomes may be invalid or inaccurate. When there is only a single discrete baseline covariate, a fully non-parametric estimation procedure to incorporate short term event time information has been previously proposed. However, such an approach is not feasible for settings with one or more continuous covariates due to the curse of dimensionality. In this paper, we propose to incorporate short term event time information along with multiple covariates collected up to a landmark point via a flexible varying-coefficient model. To evaluate and compare the prediction performance of the resulting landmark prediction rule, we use robust non-parametric procedures which do not require the correct specification of the proposed varying coefficient model. Simulation studies suggest that the proposed procedures perform well in finite samples. We illustrate them here using a dataset of post-dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文