跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接建模通胀时间序列与 SPF 多期限预测的联合动态。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Elmar Mertens
James M. Nason

通胀与专业预测的动态:黏性、持续性和波动性

研究问题
美国通胀与不同期限的平均专业预测如何共同演化,通胀缺口持续性及黏性信息下的预测更新频率是否随时间变化?
方法与思路
作者结合通胀不可观测成分模型与黏性信息预测机制,允许随机波动和时变持续性、更新频率,并用序贯蒙特卡洛估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称长期预测帮助估计趋势通胀,预测更新频率至 1990 年已较早期下降,且其变化与持续性冲击作用减弱同时发生。
阅读关注点
应核对趋势与缺口的区分、预测更新频率的识别、粒子算法的估计细节,以及不同历史阶段结论对模型设定的敏感性。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;先验、状态转移设定和参数不确定性未说明,同时发生的变化不能直接解释为因果关系。

原文摘要

This paper studies the joint dynamics of U.S. inflation and a term structure of average inflation predictions taken from the Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF). We estimate these joint dynamics by combining an unobserved components (UC) model of inflation and a sticky‐information forecast mechanism. The UC model decomposes inflation into trend and gap components, and innovations to trend and gap inflation are affected by stochastic volatility. A novelty of our model is to allow for time‐variation in inflation‐gap persistence as well as in the frequency of forecast updating under sticky information. The model is estimated with sequential Monte Carlo methods that include a particle learning filter and a Rao–Blackwellized particle smoother. Based on data from 1968 Q 4 to 2018 Q 3, estimates show that (i) longer horizon average SPF inflation predictions inform estimates of trend inflation; (ii) inflation gap persistence is countercyclical before the Volcker disinflation and acyclical afterwards; (iii) by 1990 sticky‐information inflation forecast updating is less frequent than it was earlier in the sample; and (iv) the drop in the frequency of the sticky‐information forecast updating occurs at the same time persistent shocks become less important for explaining movements in inflation. Our findings support the view that stickiness in survey forecasts is not invariant to the inflation process.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文