Conditional Inference Methods for Incomplete Poisson Data With Endogenous Time-Varying Covariates
含内生时变协变量的不完整泊松数据的条件推断方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究纵向重复观测、个体不变异质性与内生时变协变量,直接涉及面板数据方法。
含内生时变协变量的不完整泊松数据的条件推断方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We investigate the effect of protease inhibitors (PIs) on the rate of emergency room (ER) visits among HIV-infected women from a longitudinal cohort study. One strategy for accounting for serial correlation in longitudinal studies is to assume that observations are independent, conditional on unit-specific nuisance parameters. It is possible to estimate these models using unconditional maximum likelihood, where the nuisance parameters are assigned a parametric distribution and integrated out of the likelihood. Alternatively, we can proceed using conditional inference, where we eliminate the nuisance parameters from the likelihood by conditioning on a sufficient statistic for these parameters. An advantage of conditional inference methods over parametric random-effects models is that all patient-level time-invariant factors (both measured and unmeasured) are accounted for in the analysis. A limitation is that standard conditional inference methods assume that missing data are missing completely at random and do not allow endogenous time-varying covariates (i.e., past ER visits cannot predict future PI use). Both assumptions are unlikely to be met for these data, because one would expect “sicker” patients would be more likely to receive treatment and/or drop out of the study. We develop new estimation strategies that allow endogenous time-varying covariates and missing-at-random dropouts. The analysis shows that PI use reduces the rate of ER visits in patients whose CD4 cell count was <200 cells/ml at baseline. The size of the effect is substantially smaller than that estimated using a random-effects approach.