Accurate confidence limits for scalar functions of vector M-estimands
向量 M 估计目标的标量函数:高精度置信限AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于一般 M 估计与高阶置信区间理论,没有提供所列经济计量细分方向的直接证据。
向量 M 估计目标的标量函数:高精度置信限AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper concerns high‐order inference for scalar parameters that are estimated by functions of multivariate M‐estimators. Asymptotic formulae for the bias and skewness of the studentised statistic are derived. Although these formulae appear complicated, they can be evaluated easily by using matrix operations and numerical differentiation. Various methods for constructing second‐order accurate confidence limits are discussed, including a method based on skewness‐reducing transformations and a generalisation of the ABC method. The use of the skewness‐reducing transformations is closely related to empirical likelihood; expressing the studentised statistic in terms of a skewness‐reducing reparameterisation brings the standard asymptotic intervals closer in shape to empirical likelihood intervals. The improvement in one‐ and two‐sided coverage accuracy achieved by taking the bias and skewness into account is illustrated in numerical examples. It is found in the examples that taking skewness into account by reparameterisation or parameterisation invariance yields better coverage accuracy than correcting for skewness by polynomial expansions.