跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究重复相关结局及其缺失处理,对应纵向与面板数据中的不完整观测问题。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Andrea Rotnitzky
James M. Robins

非可忽略无应答下重复结局的半参数回归

研究问题
当重复相关结局部分缺失,且应答概率依赖观测与未观测值时,如何估计条件均值参数并评估非可忽略选择偏差?
方法与思路
作者提出增广应答逆概率加权估计,在应答概率可参数化且可一致估计时进行推断,并固定选择偏差参数开展敏感性分析。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该类估计无需完整参数似然或数值积分,最优成员达到半参数方差界,并将方法用于一项艾滋病临床试验。
阅读关注点
核对应答模型可识别及可一致估计的要求、增广项和最优估计构造,以及固定选择偏差参数后敏感性范围如何设定。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;不能推断后续刊本变化。作者指出联合估计可能困难或不可能,效率结论不能替代缺失机制识别。

原文摘要

We consider inference about the parameter β* indexing the conditional mean of a vector of correlated outcomes given a vector of explanatory variables when some of the outcomes are missing in a subsample of the study and the probability of response depends on both observed and unobserved data values; that is, nonresponse is nonignorable. We propose a class of augmented inverse probability of response weighted estimators that are consistent and asymptotically normal (CAN) for estimating β* when the response probabilities can be parametrically modeled and a CAN estimator exists. The proposed estimators do not require full specification of a parametric likelihood, and their computation does not require numerical integration. Our estimators can be viewed as an extension of generalized estimating equation estimators that allows for nonignorable nonresponse. We show that our class essentially consists of all CAN estimators of β*. We also show that the asymptotic variance of the optimal estimator in our class attains the semiparametric variance bound for the model. When the model for nonresponse is richly parameterized, joint estimation of the regression parameter β* and the nonresponse model parameter τ* which encodes the magnitude of nonignorable selection bias, may be difficult or impossible. Therefore we propose regarding the selection bias parameter τ* as known, rather than estimating it from the data. We then perform a sensitivity analysis that examines how inference concerning the regression parameter β* changes as we vary τ* over a range of plausible values. We apply our approach to the analysis of ACTG Trial 002, an AIDS clinical trial.

笔记与分组