跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用结构化多重检验,分组和有序结构本身不足以归入面板、网络或经济因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ang Li
Rina Foygel Barber

结构自适应 Benjamini–Hochberg 多重检验算法

研究问题
当多重检验的信号位置具有预先指定的结构时,如何利用该信息提高发现能力,并限制数据自适应造成的错误发现率膨胀?
方法与思路
作者提出 SABHA,以结构信息约束自适应权重并重新加权 p 值,通过权重类的 Rademacher 复杂度或高斯宽度分析 FDR。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,权重受充分约束时,FDR 上界仅略高于目标水平,并为有序、分组和低总变差结构给出界及应用比较。
阅读关注点
应核对 p 值的分布和依赖条件、权重约束与复杂度界,以及理论允许的超额 FDR 和应用中功效改善的评价标准。
阅读边界
仅据 Crossref 摘要;局部文字有乱码,需核对原文。摘要未列分布条件和超额 FDR 的大小,不能将其表述为精确目标水平控制。

原文摘要

Summary In multiple-testing problems, where a large number of hypotheses are tested simultaneously, false discovery rate (FDR) control can be achieved with the well-known Benjamini–Hochberg procedure, which a(0, 1]dapts to the amount of signal in the data, under certain distributional assumptions. Many modifications of this procedure have been proposed to improve power in scenarios where the hypotheses are organized into groups or into a hierarchy, as well as other structured settings. Here we introduce the ‘structure-adaptive Benjamini–Hochberg algorithm’ (SABHA) as a generalization of these adaptive testing methods. The SABHA method incorporates prior information about any predetermined type of structure in the pattern of locations of the signals and nulls within the list of hypotheses, to reweight the p-values in a data-adaptive way. This raises the power by making more discoveries in regions where signals appear to be more common. Our main theoretical result proves that the SABHA method controls the FDR at a level that is at most slightly higher than the target FDR level, as long as the adaptive weights are constrained sufficiently so as not to overfit too much to the data—interestingly, the excess FDR can be related to the Rademacher complexity or Gaussian width of the class from which we choose our data-adaptive weights. We apply this general framework to various structured settings, including ordered, grouped and low total variation structures, and obtain the bounds on the FDR for each specific setting. We also examine the empirical performance of the SABHA method on functional magnetic resonance imaging activity data and on gene–drug response data, as well as on simulated data.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文