跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:半参数不可忽略退出下边际均值推断与敏感性分析属于一般统计/计量方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Andrea Rotnitzky
James M. Robins

利用半参数无应答模型调整不可忽略的随访退出

研究问题
随访研究计划在统一终点测量结局,但部分受试者提前退出。若退出还依赖未观测的终点结局,如何推断该结局的总体边际均值,并说明结论对不可忽略退出机制的假设有多敏感?
方法与思路
摘要考虑两类半参数退出风险模型:较灵活的历史依赖设定,以及为缓解高维估计困难而追加限制的设定。因终点均值与选择偏差参数可能难以联合识别,作者将后者视为已知,并在合理范围内开展敏感性分析。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要支持的贡献是,在所设半参数退出模型下讨论终点边际均值推断,不对结局与其他测量变量的联合分布另加限制,并通过选择偏差参数的敏感性分析考察识别困难。方法应用于 AIDS 临床试验 ACTG 175。
阅读关注点
重点核对退出风险如何依赖已观测历史与终点结局、两类模型分别增加了哪些限制,以及给定偏差参数后均值推断如何成立。敏感性分析还需查看参数范围如何选择,以及结论对该范围的变化是否稳定。 阅读前先备知识:建议掌握纵向数据、退出时间与风险函数、边际均值,以及可忽略和不可忽略缺失的区别。还应理解半参数模型、维度灾难和可识别性:某个参数进入模型,并不意味着它能够仅由观测数据估计出来。
阅读边界
以下限制对应原请求所用摘要版本:基于原文摘要,未阅读全文。摘要中的风险函数公式存在缺损,敏感性分析对象的末句表述也需核对;因此这里只说明模型层次与推断目标,不复写公式,也不将固定偏差参数等同于从数据识别该参数。 经AI辅助核对旧与当前摘要内容等价;未另读刊稿全文,不能据此证明整个稿件版本等价。

原文摘要

Consider a study whose design calls for the study subjects to be followed from enrollment (time t = 0) to time t = T, at which point a primary endpoint of interest Y is to be measured. The design of the study also calls for measurements on a vector V t) of covariates to be made at one or more times t during the interval [0, T). We are interested in making inferences about the marginal mean μ0 of Y when some subjects drop out of the study at random times Q prior to the common fixed end of follow-up time T. The purpose of this article is to show how to make inferences about μ0 when the continuous drop-out time Q is modeled semiparametrically and no restrictions are placed on the joint distribution of the outcome and other measured variables. In particular, we consider two models for the conditional hazard of drop-out given (V(T), Y), where V(t) denotes the history of the process V t) through time t, t ∈ [0, T). In the first model, we assume that λQ(t|V(T), Y) exp(α0 Y), where α0 is a scalar parameter and λ0(t|V(t)) is an unrestricted positive function of t and the process V(t). When the process Vt) is high dimensional, estimation in this model is not feasible with moderate sample sizes, due to the curse of dimensionality. For such situations, we consider a second model that imposes the additional restriction that λ0(t|V(t)) = λ0(t) exp(γ′0(t)), where λ0 t) is an unspecified baseline hazard function, W(t) = w(t, V(t)), w(·,·) is a known function that maps (t, V(t)) to Rq , and γ0 is a q × 1 unknown parameter vector. When α0 ≠ 0, then drop-out is nonignorable. On account of identifiability problems, joint estimation of the mean μ0 of Y and the selection bias parameter α0 may be difficult or impossible. Therefore, we propose regarding the selection bias parameter α0 as known, rather than estimating it from the data. We then perform a sensitivity analysis to see how inference about α0 changes as we vary α0 over a plausible range of values. We apply our approach to the analysis of ACTG 175, an AIDS clinical trial.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文