跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究微阵列重复扫描的尺度转换与删失,未明确涉及经济面板或其他所列细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Tanzy Love
Alicia Carriquiry

不同尺度下带删失的重复测量:玉米微阵列分析的贝叶斯方法

研究问题
如何整合同一微阵列在不同扫描设置下产生的尺度各异、删失程度不同的读数,以改善基因表达估计及胚胎发育相关推断?
方法与思路
作者提出层级模型,将每个点位的全部扫描读数联合用于表达量估计,同时处理观测删失,并通过模拟与玉米实验数据评估方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,整合扫描的估计较已有方法具有更低偏差和均方根误差,且玉米胚胎发育实验的推断随分析方法发生明显变化。
阅读关注点
阅读时应核对扫描尺度的联系、删失机制和表达量识别方式,以及模拟比较是否反映实际扫描过程与基因推断的变化来源。
阅读边界
材料为稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;摘要未提供偏差改善数值、具体基因结果或删失假设,不能将模拟优势视为普遍性能保证。

原文摘要

We analyze data collected in a somatic embryogenesis experiment carried out on Zea mays at Iowa State University. The main objective of the study was to identify the set of genes in maize that actively participate in embryo development. Embryo tissue was sampled and analyzed at various time periods and under different mediums and light conditions. As is the case in many microarray experiments, the operator scanned each slide multiple times to find the slide-specific 'optimal' laser and sensor settings. The multiple readings of each slide are repeated measurements on different scales with differing censoring; they cannot be considered to be replicate measurements in the traditional sense. Yet it has been shown that the choice of reading can have an impact on genetic inference. We propose a hierarchical modeling approach to estimating gene expression that combines all available readings on each spot and accounts for censoring in the observed values. We assess the statistical properties of the proposed expression estimates using a simulation experiment. As expected, combining all available scans using an approach with good statistical properties results in expression estimates with noticeably lower bias and root mean squared error relative to other approaches that have been proposed in the literature. Inferences drawn from the somatic embryogenesis experiment, which motivated this work changed drastically when data were analyzed using the standard approaches or using the methodology we propose.

笔记与分组