Shortcuts for Locally Consonant Closed Test Procedures
局部协调闭合检验程序的计算捷径AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用多重检验与逻辑约束,未指向所列计量领域细分。
反馈分类问题局部协调闭合检验程序的计算捷径AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The closed testing principle provides a general and simple framework to construct powerful multiple test procedures for k elementary null hypotheses while controlling the familywise error rate in the strong sense. However, the closed testing principle has the disadvantage of leading to the evaluation of O(2k) intersection hypotheses. Multiple test procedures based on the closed testing principle may thus require substantial computational efforts. Consonant closed test procedures for unrestricted hypotheses have the advantage of rejecting at least one elementary null hypothesis whenever the global null hypothesis is rejected and thus admit shortcuts of size k. If the elementary null hypotheses are restricted by logical constraints, the closure of common tests, such as max-t or min-p tests, may not be consonant in the usual sense. In this article we introduce a weaker consonance property, denoted as local consonance, and show that many closed test procedures with restricted hypotheses satisfy this condition. We describe a general algorithm to construct related shortcuts and illustrate the results with several applications.