跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确围绕多项 Probit 离散选择模型的概率模拟与平滑展开,因子分析在此是计算方法,因此归入离散选择方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Steven Stern

多项 Probit 模型离散概率模拟矩的平滑方法

研究问题
在多项 Probit 模型的模拟矩估计中,如何平滑离散模拟变量,以便模拟导数和数据变化,并减少对大量模拟抽样的需求?
方法与思路
作者提出适用于 Probit 问题的因子分析平滑法,提供相应算法,并通过蒙特卡洛比较该方法与重要性抽样的表现。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称模拟概率无偏且取值在零到一之间,方差总小于未平滑估计,并在一大类概率下小于重要性抽样估计。
阅读关注点
应核对因子分析表示的适用条件、平滑算法与导数模拟方式,并检查无偏性和方差比较的证明及蒙特卡洛设计。
阅读边界
作者说明该方法适用范围较一般误差结构的平滑方法窄;摘要未给出全部条件,方差优势不能直接解释为参数估计总体更优。

原文摘要

THERE HAS BEEN MUCH INTEREST over the years in estimating discrete choice models. However, with the exception of multinomial logit models, agents have been restricted to few choices so that multivariate integrals could be feasibly integrated numerically.2 Pakes and Pollard (1989) and McFadden (1989) have independently developed the method of simulated moments (MSM) to deal with estimating a wide class of models of which high order discrete choice models are a subset. One of the problems a researcher must handle when using MSM for a discrete choice model is how to smooth the discrete simulated random variables. This is necessary to keep small the number of draws required to simulate derivatives and to simulate variation in the data. Geweke (1989) and McFadden (1989) have suggested importance sampling methods (and other methods) to smooth the simulated variables for general error structures. In this paper, I present a factor analytic smoothing method that can be applied to probit problems. Although it is not as general as the methods Geweke and McFadden suggest, it is easy to use and has clear intuition. Furthermore, simulated probabilities will be unbiased, will be bounded between zero and unity, and will have smaller variances than unsmoothed probabilities always and smaller variances than importance sampling estimates for a large class of probabilities. The second section of this paper develops notation, defines the problem, and presents the smoothing method and an algorithm to employ it. The last section presents Monte Carlo comparisons of the smoothing method to the importance sampling method.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文