Longitudinal weighted and trimmed treatment effects with flip interventions
翻转干预下的纵向加权与修剪处理效应AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论纵向处理效应、正值性、随机政策干预及工会会员身份对收入的影响。
翻转干预下的纵向加权与修剪处理效应AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Weighting and trimming are popular methods for addressing positivity violations in causal inference. While well-studied with single-timepoint data, standard methods do not easily generalize to longitudinal data and remain vulnerable to time-varying positivity violations. We extend weighting and trimming to longitudinal settings via stochastic “flip” interventions, which maintain the treatment status of subjects who would have received the target treatment, and flip others’ treatment to the target with probability equal to their weight (e.g., overlap weight, trimming indicator). In single-timepoint data, we show that flip interventions yield a broad class of weighted average treatment effects, providing a novel policy interpretation to these estimands. For longitudinal data, flip interventions enable interpretable weighting or trimming on time-varying covariates and, crucially, can ensure identifiability under arbitrary positivity violations. We derive a flexible estimator based on efficient influence functions when weights are smooth functions of propensity scores. Namely, we construct a new sequentially second-order estimator achieving root-n consistency and asymptotic normality under nonparametric conditions. Finally, we illustrate our methods with simulations and an analysis of the effect of union membership on earnings.