跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究节点连接、网络爬取、社群抽样和图聚类,文本证据明确对应网络方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Fan Chen
Yini Zhang
Karl Rohe

利用个性化PageRank对巨型分块模型图进行定向抽样

研究问题
在完整获取网络成本很高时,如何从一个种子节点出发抽取其所属社群,并理解个性化PageRank对非目标社群高连接度节点的偏向。
方法与思路
作者在度修正随机分块模型下分析个性化PageRank,利用局部爬取近似其向量,并研究节点度调整及度正则化的作用。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称提供了PageRank向量的可解释表达和允许有向图的聚类一致性结果,并以Twitter网络展示调整前后方法的互补性。
阅读关注点
应核对分块分离、节点度和种子选择条件,局部爬取的近似误差,以及度调整与正则化如何影响一致性和社群局部性。
阅读边界
仅据所给Crossref摘要;一致性条件、爬取成本和实证效果数值未说明,不能将Twitter示例推广至任意网络或推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Summary The paper provides statistical theory and intuition for personalized PageRank (called ‘PPR’): a popular technique that samples a small community from a massive network. We study a setting where the entire network is expensive to obtain thoroughly or to maintain, but we can start from a seed node of interest and ‘crawl’ the network to find other nodes through their connections. By crawling the graph in a designed way, the PPR vector can be approximated without querying the entire massive graph, making it an alternative to snowball sampling. Using the degree-corrected stochastic block model, we study whether the PPR vector can select nodes that belong to the same block as the seed node. We provide a simple and interpretable form for the PPR vector, highlighting its biases towards high degree nodes outside the target block. We examine a simple adjustment based on node degrees and establish consistency results for PPR clustering that allows for directed graphs. These results are enabled by recent technical advances showing the elementwise convergence of eigenvectors. We illustrate the method with the massive Twitter friendship graph, which we crawl by using the Twitter application programming interface. We find that the adjusted and unadjusted PPR techniques are complementary approaches, where the adjustment makes the results particularly localized around the seed node, and that the bias adjustment greatly benefits from degree regularization.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文