跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究高维统计判别与光谱分类,未提供所列计量领域细分的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
P. J. Brown
T. Fearn
M. S. Haque

多变量判别分析

研究问题
当变量数量很大、甚至超过训练样本数时,如何稳定识别新样本所属类别,并利用光谱变量之间的连续性?
方法与思路
作者提出灵活的贝叶斯判别方法,重点是类似正则化判别分析的层级协方差折中方法,并通过交叉分类估计超参数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,层级贝叶斯协方差方法在模拟中表现有效;文章还讨论模型拟合评分规则,并以微生物光谱分类作示例。
阅读关注点
应核对协方差层级结构如何利用光谱连续性、超参数估计的具体步骤,以及模拟和分类示例所用的评价标准。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;先验细节、比较方法和性能数值未说明,不能推断后续刊本变化。

原文摘要

Many statistical methods for discriminant analysis do not adapt well or easily to situations where the number of variables is large, possibly even exceeding the number of cases in the training set. We explore a variety of methods for providing robust identification of future samples in this situation. We develop a range of flexible Bayesian methods, and primarily a new hierarchical covariance compromise method, akin to regularized discriminant analysis. Although the methods are much more widely applicable, the motivating problem was that of discriminating between groups of samples on the basis of their near-infrared spectra. Here the ability of the Bayesian methods to take account of continuity of the spectra may be beneficial. The spectra may consist of absorbances or reflectances at as many as 1,000 wavelengths, and yet there may be only tens or hundreds of training samples in which both sample spectrum and group identity are known. Such problems arise in the food and pharmaceutical industries; for example, authentication of foods (e.g., detecting the adulteration of orange juice) and identification of pharmaceutical ingredients. Our illustrating example concerns the discrimination of 39 microbiological taxa and 8 aggregate genera. Simulations also illustrate the effectiveness of the hierarchical Bayes covariance method. We discuss a number of scoring rules, both local and global, for judging the fit of data to the Bayesian models, and adopt a cross-classificatory approach for estimating hyperparameters.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文