Fundamental barriers to high-dimensional regression with convex penalties
凸惩罚高维回归的根本障碍AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及通用高维回归与计算统计边界,未指定因果、面板、宏观或金融问题,故不强行归类。
凸惩罚高维回归的根本障碍AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In high-dimensional regression, we attempt to estimate a parameter vector β0∈Rp from n≲p observations {(yi,xi)}i≤n, where xi∈Rp is a vector of predictors and yi is a response variable. A well-established approach uses convex regularizers to promote specific structures (e.g., sparsity) of the estimate βˆ while allowing for practical algorithms. Theoretical analysis implies that convex penalization schemes have nearly optimal estimation properties in certain settings. However, in general the gaps between statistically optimal estimation (with unbounded computational resources) and convex methods are poorly understood. We show that when the statistican has very simple structural information about the distribution of the entries of β0, a large gap frequently exists between the best performance achieved by any convex regularizer satisfying a mild technical condition and either: (i) the optimal statistical error or (ii) the statistical error achieved by optimal approximate message passing algorithms. Remarkably, a gap occurs at high enough signal-to-noise ratio if and only if the distribution of the coordinates of β0 is not log-concave. These conclusions follow from an analysis of standard Gaussian designs. Our lower bounds are expected to be generally tight, and we prove tightness under certain conditions.