Investigating the performance of the Phase II Hotelling T2 chart when monitoring multivariate time series observations
监控多元时间序列时第二阶段 Hotelling T² 控制图的表现AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本；arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历，都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对，只展示已核实例，档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要明确使用 VAR 模型处理多元序列的自相关和交叉相关，研究目标为过程监控。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
监控多元时间序列时第二阶段 Hotelling T² 控制图的表现
- 研究问题
- 工业观测存在自相关和交叉相关时，直接监控原始多元序列的 Hotelling T² 控制图，与监控拟合残差的控制图相比表现如何？
- 方法与思路
- 作者以 VAR(p) 描述相关观测，构建直接用于原始数据的 T² 控制图，并依据平均运行长度及首次报警指标比较两种监控方案。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称，所提原始观测控制图在研究比较中持续优于残差方案，并用钢板轧制和化工过程中的 VAR(1)、VAR(3) 数据展示应用。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对控制界限、参数估计和受控状态的校准，检查平均运行长度及首次报警的定义，以及不同异常类型下比较是否公平。
- 阅读边界
- 这是 arXiv 预印本，不能据此认定已同行评审或期刊接收。摘要未说明异常设定和比较数值，不能据此认定该控制图在所有场景占优。
原文摘要
Thanks to high-tech measurement systems like sensors, data are often collected with high frequency in modern industrial processes. This phenomenon could potentially produce autocorrelated and cross-correlated measurements. It has been shown that if this issue is not properly accounted for while designing the control charts, many false alarms may be observed, disrupting the monitoring process efficiency. There are generally two recommended ways to monitor autocorrelated data: fitting a time series model and then monitoring the residuals or directly monitoring the original observations. Although residual charts are popular in the literature because they offer advantages such as ease of implementation, questions have been raised about their efficiency due to the loss of information. This paper develops the methodology for applying Hotelling's T2 chart directly to monitoring multivariate autocorrelated and cross-correlated observations. To model such data, we use the multivariate vector autoregressive time series model of order p >= 1, denoted as VAR(p). We compare the performance of the T2 chart based on the original observations and the residual-based T2 chart using the well-known metric average run length and a newly introduced criterion called first-to-signal. The results indicate that the proposed method consistently outperforms the alternative chart. We also illustrate the proposed method using two examples: one from a steel sheet rolling process (VAR(1) observations) and another from a chemical process (VAR(3) observations).