跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦稳健高维回归与优化,分位数损失的出现不足以归为分位数或分布效应研究。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yinan Shen
Jingyang Li
Jian-Feng Cai
Dong Xia

计算高效且统计最优的稳健高维线性回归

研究问题
在重尾噪声或异常值背景下,如何兼顾高维稀疏与低秩线性回归的计算效率、统计误差及非光滑损失优化?
方法与思路
作者提出投影次梯度下降,在一般框架中建立两阶段收敛理论,并考察绝对损失、Huber损失和分位数损失。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称算法在所述高斯及有限一加ε阶矩重尾噪声条件下达到统计最优,第二阶段线性收敛,并以模拟支持这些主张。
阅读关注点
应核对设计与噪声条件、统计最优的比较标准、两阶段切换及步长规则,以及随机噪声平滑机制的适用范围。
阅读边界
OpenAlex索引摘要未注明稿件版本。摘要未给出完整条件、污染比例或模拟数值,不能把最优性与模拟优势推广到任意异常值或设计情形。

原文摘要

High-dimensional linear regression under heavy-tailed noise or outlier corruption is challenging, both computationally and statistically. Convex approaches have been proven statistically optimal but suffer from high computational costs, especially since the robust loss functions are usually nonsmooth. More recently, computationally fast nonconvex approaches via subgradient descent are proposed, which, unfortunately, fail to deliver a statistically consistent estimator even under sub-Gaussian noise. In this paper, we introduce a projected subgradient descent algorithm for both the sparse linear regression and low-rank linear regression problems. The algorithm is not only computationally efficient with linear convergence but also statistically optimal, be the noise Gaussian or heavy-tailed with a finite 1 + ε moment. The convergence theory is established for a general framework and its specific applications to absolute loss, Huber loss and quantile loss are investigated. Compared with existing nonconvex methods, ours reveals a surprising phenomenon of two-phase convergence. In phase one, the algorithm behaves as in typical nonsmooth optimization that requires gradually decaying stepsizes. However, phase one only delivers a statistically suboptimal estimator, which is already observed in the existing literature. Interestingly, during phase two, the algorithm converges linearly as if minimizing a smooth and strongly convex objective function, and thus a constant stepsize suffices. Underlying the phase-two convergence is the smoothing effect of random noise to the nonsmooth robust losses in an area close but not too close to the truth. Numerical simulations confirm our theoretical discovery and showcase the superiority of our algorithm over prior methods.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文