Forecasting co-volatilities via factor models with asymmetry and long memory in realized covariance
通过含非对称性与长记忆的因子模型预测已实现协方差AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以因子多变量随机波动模型预测金融资产已实现协方差,因此最直接对应金融因子与波动率方向。
通过含非对称性与长记忆的因子模型预测已实现协方差AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Modeling covariance structures are known to suffer from the curse of dimensionality. In order to avoid the problem for forecasting, the paper proposes a new factor multivariate stochastic volatility (fMSV) model for realized covariance measures that accommodates asymmetry and long memory. Using the basic structure of the fMSV model, the paper extends the dynamic correlation MSV model, the conditional/stochastic Wishart autoregressive models, the matrix-exponential MSV model, and the Cholesky MSV model. Empirical results for 7 financial asset returns for the US stock returns indicate that the new fMSV models outperform existing dynamic conditional correlation models for forecasting future covariances. Regarding the forecasting performance for one-day, five-day and ten-day horizons, the recommended specification among the new fMSV models is the stochastic Wishart autoregressive specification with asymmetric effects for the periods during and after the global financial crisis, while the Cholesky fMSV model with long memory and asymmetry displays the best performance for periods without the financial turbulence.