A lava attack on the recovery of sums of dense and sparse signals
用 lava 恢复稠密与稀疏信号之和AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般高维信号恢复与预测风险,没有明确的宏观预测或金融收益预测对象。
用 lava 恢复稠密与稀疏信号之和AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Common high-dimensional methods for prediction rely on having either a sparse signal model, a model in which most parameters are zero and there are a small number of nonzero parameters that are large in magnitude, or a dense signal model, a model with no large parameters and very many small nonzero parameters. We consider a generalization of these two basic models, termed here a “sparse $+$ dense” model, in which the signal is given by the sum of a sparse signal and a dense signal. Such a structure poses problems for traditional sparse estimators, such as the lasso, and for traditional dense estimation methods, such as ridge estimation. We propose a new penalization-based method, called lava, which is computationally efficient. With suitable choices of penalty parameters, the proposed method strictly dominates both lasso and ridge. We derive analytic expressions for the finite-sample risk function of the lava estimator in the Gaussian sequence model. We also provide a deviation bound for the prediction risk in the Gaussian regression model with fixed design. In both cases, we provide Stein’s unbiased estimator for lava’s prediction risk. A simulation example compares the performance of lava to lasso, ridge and elastic net in a regression example using data-dependent penalty parameters and illustrates lava’s improved performance relative to these benchmarks.