跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用选择后区间与微阵列应用,未提供所列经济计量方向的直接证据,故不作领域细分归类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Zhigen Zhao
J. T. Gene Hwang

控制错误覆盖率的经验贝叶斯置信区间

研究问题
当大量参数中仅报告被选中的部分区间时,如何处理选择偏差与多重性,并在贝叶斯平均意义下控制错误覆盖率?
方法与思路
作者以参数分布下的平均错误覆盖率为准则,为特定先验分布类构造收缩区间,并用解析与数值计算考察控制性质。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称所提区间在研究的先验类中控制贝叶斯错误覆盖率,减轻选择造成的中心偏差,并获得较短的平均区间长度。
阅读关注点
应核对贝叶斯与频率学错误覆盖率的区别、选择规则和先验类限制,以及未知混合概率的处理与区间长度比较条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;平均控制不等于对每个参数配置均控制,区间长度优势也不能脱离文中的比较范围推广。

原文摘要

Summary Benjamini and Yekutieli suggested that it is important to account for multiplicity correction for confidence intervals when only some of the selected intervals are reported. They introduced the concept of the false coverage rate (FCR) for confidence intervals which is parallel to the concept of the false discovery rate in the multiple-hypothesis testing problem and they developed confidence intervals for selected parameters which control the FCR. Their approach requires the FCR to be controlled in the frequentist’s sense, i.e. controlled for all the possible unknown parameters. In modern applications, the number of parameters could be large, as large as tens of thousands or even more, as in microarray experiments. We propose a less conservative criterion, the Bayes FCR, and study confidence intervals controlling it for a class of distributions. The Bayes FCR refers to the average FCR with respect to a distribution of parameters. Under such a criterion, we propose some confidence intervals, which, by some analytic and numerical calculations, are demonstrated to have the Bayes FCR controlled at level q for a class of prior distributions, including mixtures of normal distributions and zero, where the mixing probability is unknown. The confidence intervals are shrinkage-type procedures which are more efficient for the θis that have a sparsity structure, which is a common feature of microarray data. More importantly, the centre of the proposed shrinkage intervals reduces much of the bias due to selection. Consequently, the proposed empirical Bayes intervals are always shorter in average length than the intervals of Benjamini and Yekutieli and can be only 50% or 60% as long in some cases. We apply these procedures to the data of Choe and colleagues and obtain similar results.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文