跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论分层调查的重抽样方差估计,未涉及所列面板、因果、时间序列或金融研究对象。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
J. N. K. Rao
J. Shao

分层随机抽样中的平衡半样本方差估计

研究问题
层数固定而各层样本增大时,分组平衡半样本法为什么会导致错误推断,怎样修改方差估计以获得渐近有效性?
方法与思路
作者提出独立重复分组后平均方差估计的方法,并研究每层构造两单位子层的替代方案,推导渐近结果和模拟比较。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称原分组方法在所述渐近框架下无效,两种修改具有相应有效性;模拟中重复分组十五次已有较好表现。
阅读关注点
应核对固定层数的渐近框架、重复次数与层内样本量的趋于无穷要求,以及子层构造和有限次重复下的区间覆盖。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,版本未注明。十五次重复的表现是模拟结果,不能替代重复次数趋于无穷的理论条件,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Establishment surveys based on list frames often use stratified random sampling with a small number of strata, H, and relatively large sample sizes, n h , within strata. For such surveys, a grouped balanced half-sample (GBHS) method is often used for variance estimation and for construction of confidence intervals on population parameters of interest. In this method the sample in each stratum is first randomly divided into two groups, and then the balanced half-sample (BHS) method is applied to the groups. We show that the GBHS method leads to asymptotically incorrect inferences as the strata sample sizes n h → ∞ with H fixed. To overcome this difficulty, we propose a repeatedly grouped balanced half-sample (RGBHS) method, which essentially involves independently repeating the grouping T times and then taking the average of the resulting T GBHS variance estimators. This method retains the simplicity of the GBHS method. We establish its asymptotic validity as min n h → ∞ and T → ∞. We also study an alternative method by forming substrata within each stratum, consisting of a pair of sampling units, and then applying the BHS method on the total set of substrata, treating them as strata. We establish its asymptotic validity as min n h → ∞. We provide simulation results on the finite-sample properties of the GBHS, RGBHS, the jackknife, and the alternative BHS method. Our results indicate that the proposed RGBHS method performs well for T as small as 15, thus providing flexibility in terms of the number of half-samples used. The alternative BHS method has also performed well in the simulation study.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文