ON ASYMPTOTIC OPTIMALITY OF LEAST SQUARES MODEL AVERAGING WHEN TRUE MODEL IS INCLUDED
真实模型包含在候选集中时最小二乘模型平均的渐近最优性AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用模型平均理论,未明确对应所列微观、宏观或金融细分方向。
反馈分类问题真实模型包含在候选集中时最小二乘模型平均的渐近最优性AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Asymptotic optimality is a key theoretical property in model averaging. Due to technical difficulties, existing studies rely on restricted weight sets or on the assumption that there is no true model with fixed dimensions in the candidate set. The focus of this article is to overcome these difficulties by studying a class of least squares model averaging methods with nested candidate models, which includes Mallows model averaging (MMA) of Hansen (2007, Econometrica 75, 1175–1189) and parsimonious model averaging (PMA) of Zhang et al. (2020, Journal of the American Statistical Association 115, 972–984) as special cases. The main results are as follows. First, MMA with fixed model dimensions is neither asymptotically loss optimal nor asymptotically risk optimal. Second, when the true model dimension diverges, MMA is asymptotically both loss and risk optimal. Third, when the true model dimension is fixed, PMA is asymptotically risk optimal but not asymptotically loss optimal, which differs from the corresponding result in Fang, Yuan, and Tian (2023, Econometric Theory 39, 412–441). This finding also reveals that the discrete weight set of Hansen (2007) and the usual weight set can lead to different asymptotic properties: asymptotic loss optimality holds under the former but fails under the latter. Finally, when the true model dimension diverges, PMA is asymptotically both loss and risk optimal. Simulation studies illustrate the theoretical findings in a variety of settings.