跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及诊断筛查中的缺失人数估计和检验关联,未直接对应所列因果、分布效应或金融风险方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Dankmar Böhning
Valentin Patilea

仅核实筛查阳性者疾病状态时的双诊断检验捕获—再捕获方法

研究问题
两项筛查均阴性者的疾病状态未知时,如何估计缺失单元格人数,并允许两项检验相关而非强制假设独立?
方法与思路
作者修改简单捕获—再捕获估计量,提出两个允许筛查检验相关的估计量,但要求关联形式在不同疾病状态之间同质。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新估计量容易构造,在所考察筛查研究中优于传统方法;与更难计算的最大似然估计相比,效率损失较小。
阅读关注点
应核对跨疾病状态关联同质性的精确定义、缺失人数的识别条件,以及比较研究如何利用完整疾病状态评价估计表现。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;允许相关仍依赖同质性假设,摘要未提供性能数值或稳健性结果。

原文摘要

The article considers screening human populations with two screening tests. If any of the two tests is positive, then full evaluation of the disease status is undertaken; however, if both diagnostic tests are negative, then disease status remains unknown. This procedure leads to a data constellation in which, for each disease status, the 2 × 2 table associated with the two diagnostic tests used in screening has exactly one empty, unknown cell. To estimate the unobserved cell counts, previous approaches assume independence of the two diagnostic tests and use specific models, including the special mixture model of Walter or unconstrained capture–recapture estimates. Often, as is also demonstrated in this article by means of a simple test, the independence of the two screening tests is not supported by the data. Two new estimators are suggested that allow associations of the screening test, although the form of association must be assumed to be homogeneous over disease status. These estimators are modifications of the simple capture–recapture estimator and easy to construct. The estimators are investigated for several screening studies with fully evaluated disease status in which the superior behavior of the new estimators compared to the previous conventional ones can be shown. Finally, the performance of the new estimators is compared with maximum likelihood estimators, which are more difficult to obtain in these models. The results indicate the loss of efficiency as minor.

笔记与分组