跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要主要研究生存时间预测集校准,边际分位数作为技术环节不足以明确归入经济分布效应研究。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

右删失事件时间预测集的双重稳健高效校准

研究问题
在仅能观察事件时间与删失时间中较早者的右删失数据中,如何构造具有覆盖保证的未来生存时间预测下界?
方法与思路
作者在条件独立删失假设下,借鉴保形推断,构造逆删失概率加权下界及基于边际分位数有效影响函数的增广版本。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,各方法具有渐近覆盖保证;增广方法的覆盖误差界双重稳健且为二阶,并在所比较方法中提高效率。
阅读关注点
应核对条件独立删失的具体表述、覆盖概率的目标、辅助函数估计要求,以及二阶误差界和效率比较所需条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,不能将渐近保证解释为有限样本精确覆盖;摘要未说明具体收敛速率及全部适用条件。

原文摘要

Abstract Our objective is to construct well-calibrated prediction sets for a time-to-event outcome subject to right censoring with guaranteed coverage. Inspired by modern conformal inference, our approach avoids the need for a well-specified parametric or semiparametric survival model. Unlike existing conformal methods for survival data, which assume Type-I censoring with fully observed censoring times, we consider the more common right-censoring setting in which only the censoring time or the event time is observed, whichever comes first. Under a standard conditional independence censoring condition, we propose and analyse several lower prediction bounds for the survival time of a future observation, including inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting and its augmented version based on the semiparametric efficient influence function for the relevant marginal quantile of the outcome, accounting for dependent censoring. We formally establish asymptotic coverage guarantees for the proposed methods and demonstrate, both theoretically and through empirical experiments, that the augmented approach substantially improves efficiency over all other proposed methods. Specifically, its coverage error bound is doubly robust, and therefore of second order, thus ensuring that it is asymptotically negligible relative to the coverage error of the other methods.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文