A New Confidence Interval Method Based on the Normal Approximation for the Difference of Two Binomial Probabilities
基于正态近似的两二项概率之差置信区间新方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般二项概率差的区间估计,没有明确的因果效应或其他所列领域语境。
反馈分类问题基于正态近似的两二项概率之差置信区间新方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Using a general method for obtaining confidence intervals from samples from discrete distributions, this article introduces a new confidence interval method for estimating the difference of two binomial probabilities and compares it to three other confidence interval methods, one of which is the usual method with no continuity correction. Each of the other two confidence interval methods uses its own continuity correction; one combines it with an estimate of the standard error that is slightly different from that commonly used. Some values of the “exact” confidence interval limits are also derived. The four confidence interval methods, each of which is based on the normal approximation and can be carried out easily on a hand calculator, are compared in terms of their precision, the agreement of their coverage probabilities with nominal confidence level values, and the smallness of their sample sizes before the normal approximation can be considered appropriate. Coverage probabilities and measures of precision are computed exactly rather than estimated by simulation. On the basis of these comparisons, the new confidence interval method is recommended.