跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论一阶自回归扰动、序列相关及忽略相关性的后验赔率误差,直接对应时间序列方法中的模型比较问题。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kenneth M. Gaver
Martin S. Geisel

具有相关扰动的线性模型之间的判别

研究问题
当候选线性模型的扰动具有非标量协方差结构时,如何进行贝叶斯模型比较,忽略一阶自相关会怎样影响后验赔率?
方法与思路
作者给出一般后验赔率表达式,针对一阶自回归扰动推导忽略相关性所致误差的近似表达,并用小型抽样实验考察近似精度。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,论文给出非标量扰动协方差下的贝叶斯线性模型比较表达式,并分析忽略一阶序列相关时后验赔率的计算误差。
阅读关注点
核对模型与参数先验、协方差结构的处理及近似成立条件,并查看抽样实验如何衡量忽略序列相关造成的后验赔率误差。
阅读边界
摘要未说明具体先验、近似公式、抽样实验设计或精度结果,无法判断近似的适用范围及其对具体模型选择的影响。

原文摘要

PROBLEMS OF COMPARING or choosing among models of a stochastic process are frequently encountered in empirical research. In many such situations, conventional statistical procedures offer little guidance since they assume that the model is given. If the alternative models can be nested in a more general model, standard estimation and testing procedures can be employed. Often, however, such general models are not readily available and other considerations may dictate against their use. Recently, there has been considerable progress in the development of methods for comparing alternative non-rested models. A review of this work both Bayesian and non-Bayesian, is given in Gaver and Geisel [1]. Discussions of the Bayesian approach to the comparison of linear regression models are given in Zellner [3, Ch. 10] and Lempers [2], among others. In this paper we consider Bayesian comparison of linear models in which the disturbances have non-scalar covariance matrices. General posterior odds expressions are given and specialized to the case of first order autoregressive disturbances. We also consider a specification error problem in this context; that is, we examine the effect of ignoring the non-scalar covariance structure on the posterior odds ratio. For the first order autoregressive disturbance case we give an approximate expression indicating the magnitude of the error involved in computing the posterior odds ignoring the serial correlation. The accuracy of this approximation is investigated via a small sampling experiment. We use the following notatiori: Let the ith model, Mi (i = 1, 2,. .., N), be y = Xi/3i + yi where y is a T x 1 vector of observations on the random (dependent) variable of interest, Xi is a T x ki matrix of observations on the explanatory variables of Mi (Xi is assumed to be non-stochastic with rank ki), p3i is a ki x 1 vector of unknown parameters of Mi, and ui is a T x 1 vector of disturbances of Mi (yi is assumed to have a normal distribution with E(yi) = 0, and E(yiyii) = U22i where 2Ji is an unknown T x T positive definite symmetric matrix with trace (i) = T).2 Probability functions for the models are denoted by P( ), densities for parameters by 7r( ), and densities for observations by p( ).

笔记与分组
相关领域论文