Drift vs Shift: Decoupling Trends and Changepoint Analysis
漂移与突变：趋势和变点分析的分离AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本；arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历，都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对，只展示已核实例，档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要明确研究时间序列趋势、变点及动态回归参数突变，对应时间序列与结构变化方向。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
漂移与突变：趋势和变点分析的分离
- 研究问题
- 面对复杂噪声与异常值，如何区分时间序列中的平滑趋势漂移和离散结构突变，并识别均值、斜率或动态参数的变化？
- 方法与思路
- 作者先用带收缩先验的贝叶斯动态线性模型刻画趋势，再结合其后验分布与加权惩罚似然估计定位突变。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称，框架结合动态模型的灵活性与惩罚估计的硬阈值特征，可处理异常值及多类变化，并能扩展至时变参数模型。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对漂移与突变的区分规则、先验和惩罚参数选择、两阶段不确定性处理，以及复杂噪声和异常值下的识别表现。
- 阅读边界
- 这是 arXiv 预印本，同行评审与期刊接收均未核实；摘要未给出变点一致性或误报控制条件，模拟比较不能保证适用于所有趋势形态。
原文摘要
We introduce a new approach for decoupling trends (drift) and changepoints (shifts) in time series. Our locally adaptive model-based approach for robustly decoupling combines Bayesian trend filtering and machine learning based regularization. An over-parameterized Bayesian dynamic linear model (DLM) is first applied to characterize drift. Then a weighted penalized likelihood estimator is paired with the estimated DLM posterior distribution to identify shifts. We show how Bayesian DLMs specified with so-called shrinkage priors can provide smooth estimates of underlying trends in the presence of complex noise components. However, their inability to shrink exactly to zero inhibits direct changepoint detection. In contrast, penalized likelihood methods are highly effective in locating changepoints. However, they require data with simple patterns in both signal and noise. The proposed decoupling approach combines the strengths of both, i.e. the flexibility of Bayesian DLMs with the hard thresholding property of penalized likelihood estimators, to provide changepoint analysis in complex, modern settings. The proposed framework is outlier robust and can identify a variety of changes, including in mean and slope. It is also easily extended for analysis of parameter shifts in time-varying parameter models like dynamic regressions. We illustrate the flexibility and contrast the performance and robustness of our approach with several alternative methods across a wide range of simulations and application examples.