Bayesian Imputation with Optimal Look-Ahead-Bias and Variance Tradeoff
平衡前视偏差与方差的贝叶斯缺失值填补AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究按时间揭示信息的序列缺失值填补,因此归入时间序列;组合配置应用尚不足以归入资产定价。
平衡前视偏差与方差的贝叶斯缺失值填补AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Missing time-series data is a prevalent problem in many prescriptive analytics models in operations management, healthcare and finance. Imputation methods for time-series data are usually applied to the full panel data with the purpose of training a prescriptive model for a downstream out-of-sample task. For example, the imputation of missing asset returns may be applied before estimating an optimal portfolio allocation. However, this practice can result in a look-ahead-bias in the future performance of the downstream task, and there is an inherent trade-off between the look-ahead-bias of using the entire data set for imputation and the larger variance of using only the training portion of the data set for imputation. By connecting layers of information revealed in time, we propose a Bayesian consensus posterior that fuses an arbitrary number of posteriors to optimize the variance and look-ahead-bias trade-off in the imputation. We derive tractable two-step optimization procedures for finding the optimal consensus posterior, with Kullback-Leibler divergence and Wasserstein distance as the dissimilarity measure between posterior distributions. We demonstrate in simulations and in an empirical study the benefit of our imputation mechanism for portfolio allocation with missing returns.