跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究敏感问题的调查测量与回归,未明确涉及所列离散选择或因果效应分析。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kosuke Imai

项目计数法的多变量回归分析

研究问题
列表实验只观察项目计数而不直接观察敏感回答时,如何估计肯定回答概率随受访者特征变化的关系并提高效率?
方法与思路
作者提出非线性最小二乘和最大似然估计,开发两步程序与 EM 算法,并用种族与政治调查说明多变量分析。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,这些方法支持敏感回答概率的回归分析;小规模模拟提示最大似然估计可能更有效率,并提供开源实现。
阅读关注点
应核对列表实验的设计条件、计数与敏感回答之间的模型关系,以及两类估计量的识别要求和效率比较设置。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要,无法判断关键识别条件;小规模模拟不能支持普遍效率优势。

原文摘要

The item count technique is a survey methodology that is designed to elicit respondents’ truthful answers to sensitive questions such as racial prejudice and drug use. The method is also known as the list experiment or the unmatched count technique and is an alternative to the commonly used randomized response method. In this article, I propose new nonlinear least squares and maximum likelihood estimators for efficient multivariate regression analysis with the item count technique. The two-step estimation procedure and the Expectation Maximization algorithm are developed to facilitate the computation. Enabling multivariate regression analysis is essential because researchers are typically interested in knowing how the probability of answering the sensitive question affirmatively varies as a function of respondents’ characteristics. As an empirical illustration, the proposed methodology is applied to the 1991 National Race and Politics survey where the investigators used the item count technique to measure the degree of racial hatred in the United States. Small-scale simulation studies suggest that the maximum likelihood estimator can be substantially more efficient than alternative estimators. Statistical efficiency is an important concern for the item count technique because indirect questioning means loss of information. The open-source software is made available to implement the proposed methodology.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文