The promises of multiple experiments: identifying joint distribution of potential outcomes
多重实验的潜力:识别潜在结果的联合分布AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究潜在结果联合分布的识别与因果效应估计,同时涉及超出边际均值的分布对象,故归入因果与分布方向。
多重实验的潜力:识别潜在结果的联合分布AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Abstract Typical causal effects are defined based on the marginal distribution of potential outcomes. However, many real-world applications require causal estimands involving the joint distribution of potential outcomes to enable nuanced treatment evaluation and selection. In this article, we propose a novel framework for identifying and estimating the joint distribution of potential outcomes using multiple experimental datasets. We introduce the assumption of transportability of state transition probabilities for potential outcomes across datasets and establish the identification of the joint distribution under this assumption, along with a regular rank condition. The key identification assumptions have testable implications in an overidentified setting and are analogous to those in the context of instrumental variables, with the dataset indicator serving as ‘instrument’. Moreover, we propose an easy-to-use least-squares-based estimator for the joint distribution of potential outcomes in each dataset, proving its consistency and asymptotic normality. We further extend the proposed framework to identify and estimate principal causal effects. We empirically demonstrate the proposed framework by conducting extensive simulations and applying it to evaluate the surrogate endpoint in a real-world application.