跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦不同父母收入位置的代际流动弹性及其异质性,最接近分位数与分布效应方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yonghong An
Le Wang
Ruli Xiao

非参数非经典测量误差方法下的代际流动弹性估计

研究问题
子女与父母的永久收入均不可直接观测、收入关系可能非线性时,如何处理生命周期偏误并估计不同收入位置的代际流动弹性?
方法与思路
作者构建非参数非经典测量误差框架,不预设父母与子女收入关系的函数形式,处理永久收入的潜在性,并检验流动函数的线性假设。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在 PSID 数据中拒绝线性假设,发现代际流动弹性具有明显异质性并呈 U 形,中间收入群体流动较强,收入两端较弱。
阅读关注点
阅读全文时应核对永久收入与非经典测量误差的识别条件、生命周期偏误的处理、线性检验,以及 U 形弹性与流动性解释的对应关系。
阅读边界
摘要未说明测量误差识别假设、估计精度或样本细节;关于不平等与下一代流动性的讨论,不能仅凭摘要认定为已识别的因果关系。

原文摘要

This article provides a framework for estimating intergenerational mobility elasticities (IGEs) of children’s income with respect to parental income. We allow the IGEs to be heterogeneous, by leaving the relationship of parental and child incomes unspecified, while acknowledging and addressing the latent nature of both child and parental permanent incomes and the resulted life-cycle bias. Our framework enables us to test the widely imposed assumption that the intergenerational mobility function is linear. Applying our method to the Panel Studies of Income Dynamics data, we decisively reject the commonly imposed linearity assumption and find substantial heterogeneity in the IGEs across the population. We confirm an important finding that the IGEs with respect to parental income exhibit a U-shape pattern, which is occasionally highlighted in the analysis using transition matrices. Specifically, there is a considerable degree of mobility among the broadly defined middle class, but the children of both high- and low-income parents are more likely to be high- and low-income adults, respectively. This result also provides insights into the (intertemporal) Great Gatsby curve, suggesting that a higher level of inequality within one generation may lead to a higher level of social immobility in the next generation in the United States.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文