跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究离散数据中的因果效应、部分识别与锐界,并处理混杂、选择和测量误差等识别障碍。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Guilherme Duarte
Noam Finkelstein
Dean Knox
Jonathan Mummolo
Ilya Shpitser

离散情形下因果推断的自动化方法

研究问题
当离散数据中的因果量无法点识别,且存在混杂、选择或测量等复杂问题时,如何自动计算与已有信息一致的界?
方法与思路
作者将离散因果问题转化为多项式规划,结合对偶松弛与空间分支定界,在给定目标量、假设和数据下搜索可行过程。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称算法可求锐界或点识别解;未完成时仍报告包含真值的外界,并以 ε 锐性衡量界的最坏松弛程度。
阅读关注点
应核对因果假设如何编码、搜索空间的构造和数值保证,以及 ε 锐性的定义、停止规则与复杂场景中的计算成本。
阅读边界
依据 arXiv 2109.13471v1 预印本摘要,不能据此声称已同行评审或期刊接收;保证依赖输入假设与信息,具体条件和刊本变化未提供。

原文摘要

When causal quantities cannot be point identified, researchers often pursue partial identification to quantify the range of possible values. However, the peculiarities of applied research conditions can make this analytically intractable. We present a general and automated approach to causal inference in discrete settings. We show causal questions with discrete data reduce to polynomial programming problems, and we present an algorithm to automatically bound causal effects using efficient dual relaxation and spatial branch-and-bound techniques. The user declares an estimand, states assumptions, and provides data (however incomplete or mismeasured). The algorithm then searches over admissible data-generating processes and outputs the most precise possible range consistent with available information -- i.e., sharp bounds -- including a point-identified solution if one exists. Because this search can be computationally intensive, our procedure reports and continually refines non-sharp ranges that are guaranteed to contain the truth at all times, even when the algorithm is not run to completion. Moreover, it offers an additional guarantee we refer to as $ε$-sharpness, characterizing the worst-case looseness of the incomplete bounds. Analytically validated simulations show the algorithm accommodates classic obstacles, including confounding, selection, measurement error, noncompliance, and nonresponse.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文