跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用元分析与汇总信息合并,临床试验背景不足以确定具体因果推断方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Dungang Liu
Regina Y. Liu
Minge Xie

仅用汇总统计量的异质研究多变量元分析:效率与稳健性

研究问题
部分研究无法单独估计目标参数时,如何利用异质研究中的直接与间接信息?摘要关注常规排除做法造成的信息损失。
方法与思路
作者合并由各研究汇总统计量构造的置信密度函数,在一般似然推断框架下形成 CD 元分析方法,无需个体层面数据。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该方法渐近效率可达到汇集个体数据的最大似然分析,并对参数估计量工作协方差结构的误设具有稳健性。
阅读关注点
应核对不同研究参数如何关联、间接信息如何识别目标,以及效率等价与协方差误设稳健性各自需要的条件。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;研究间兼容性和效率结论的具体条件未列出,稳健性不能扩展为对任意模型误设有效。

原文摘要

Meta-analysis has been widely used to synthesize evidence from multiple studies for common hypotheses or parameters of interest. However, it has not yet been fully developed for incorporating heterogeneous studies, which arise often in applications due to different study designs, populations, or outcomes. For heterogeneous studies, the parameter of interest may not be estimable for certain studies, and in such a case, these studies are typically excluded from conventional meta-analysis. The exclusion of part of the studies can lead to a nonnegligible loss of information. This article introduces a meta-analysis for heterogeneous studies by combining the confidence density functions derived from the summary statistics of individual studies, hence referred to as the CD approach. It includes all the studies in the analysis and makes use of all information, direct as well as indirect. Under a general likelihood inference framework, this new approach is shown to have several desirable properties, including: (i) it is asymptotically as efficient as the maximum likelihood approach using individual participant data (IPD) from all studies; (ii) unlike the IPD analysis, it suffices to use summary statistics to carry out the CD approach. Individual-level data are not required; and (iii) it is robust against misspecification of the working covariance structure of parameter estimates. Besides its own theoretical significance, the last property also substantially broadens the applicability of the CD approach. All the properties of the CD approach are further confirmed by data simulated from a randomized clinical trials setting as well as by real data on aircraft landing performance. Overall, one obtains a unifying approach for combining summary statistics, subsuming many of the existing meta-analysis methods as special cases.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文