On testing Kronecker product structure in tensor factor models
张量因子模型中Kronecker积结构的检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究张量时间序列及其因子载荷结构,直接对应因子模型与时间序列方法,但未限定宏观应用。
张量因子模型中Kronecker积结构的检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Abstract We propose a test for the Kronecker product structure of a factor loading matrix implied by a tensor factor model with Tucker decomposition in the common component. By defining a Kronecker product structure set, we determine whether a tensor time series has a Kronecker product structure, equivalent to its ability to decompose the series according to a tensor factor model. Our test is built on analysing and comparing the residuals from fitting a full tensor factor model, and the residuals from fitting a factor model on a reshaped version of the data. In the most extreme case, the reshaping is the vectorization of the tensor data, and the factor loading matrix in such a case can be general if there is no Kronecker product structure present. Our test is also generalized to the Khatri–Rao product structure in a tensor factor model with canonical polyadic decomposition. Theoretical results are developed through asymptotic normality results on estimated residuals. Numerical experiments suggest that the size of the tests approaches the pre-set nominal value as the sample size or the order of the tensor increases, while the power increases with mode dimensions and the number of combined modes. We demonstrate our tests through extensive real data examples.