跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确把密度拟合检验用于美国各州对数收入分布及其正态混合表示。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kuangyu Wen
Ximing Wu

引导式非参数拟合优度检验及其收入分布应用

研究问题
如何检验参数密度的拟合优度,在控制非参数估计偏差的同时避免欠平滑或原假设密度卷积,并用于收入分布?
方法与思路
作者以待检验参数密度作为非参数密度估计的起点,基于两者距离构造检验,并研究统计性质及有限样本表现。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该估计在原假设下消除典型非参数偏差、邻近备择下减小偏差;州收入应用中除一州外两或三成分正态混合已足够。
阅读关注点
应核对引导密度估计的构造、参数拟合与带宽的处理,以及功效比较和各州正态混合拟合判断的检验依据。
阅读边界
摘要未给出统计量、带宽条件或各州检验数值;混合分布足够拟合是所述样本中的检验判断,不能等同真实分布已确定。

原文摘要

Summary We have developed a customizable goodness-of-fit test of a parametric density based on its distance to a consistently estimated density. This consistent estimate is obtained via a nonparametric density estimator with a parametric start, wherein the start is set to be the hypothesized parametric density. To cope with the influence of nonparametric estimation bias, nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests have resorted to remedies such as undersmoothing or convolution of the hypothesized density. Our test requires no such devices and possesses enhanced powers against alternative densities because the guided density estimator is free of the typical nonparametric bias under the null hypothesis and attains bias reduction when the underlying density is in a broad nonparametric neighborhood of the hypothesized density. Here, we establish the statistical properties of our test and use Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate its finite sample performance. We use this test to examine the goodness-of-fit of normal mixtures to the distributions of log income of U.S. states. Although normality is rejected decisively, our results suggest that normal mixtures with two or three components suffice for all but one state.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文