Risk-adjusted monitoring of time to event
事件发生时间的风险调整监测AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:核心是通用生存监测与质量控制,零售金融示例不足以确定金融风险或宏观结构变化分类。
反馈分类问题事件发生时间的风险调整监测AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Recently there has been interest in risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts, CUSUMs, to monitor the performance of e.g. hospitals, taking into account the heterogeneity of patients. Even though many outcomes involve time, only conventional regression models are commonly used. In this article we investigate how time to event models may be used for monitoring purposes. We consider monitoring using CUSUMs based on the partial likelihood ratio between an out-of-control state and an in-control state. We consider both proportional and non-proportional alternatives, as well as a head start. Against proportional alternatives, we present an analytic method of computing the expected number of observed events before stopping or the probability of stopping before a given observed number of events. In a stationary set-up, the former is roughly proportional to the average run length in calendar time. Adding a head start changes the threshold only slightly if the expected number of events until hitting is used as a criterion. However, it changes the threshold substantially if a false alarm probability is used. In simulation studies, charts based on survival analysis perform better than simpler monitoring schemes. We present one example from retail finance and one medical application.