跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以随机实验中的异质性处理效应、分组因果效应及其统计推断为核心。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kosuke Imai
Michael Lingzhi Li

随机实验中通用机器学习发现的异质性处理效应推断

研究问题
随机实验中用机器学习估计条件处理效应并据此分组后,如何对组内平均效应、组间差异和效应排序进行有效推断?
方法与思路
作者采用 Neyman 重复抽样框架,利用处理随机分配与单位随机抽样构造分组效应区间和检验,并计入交叉拟合的分割不确定性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法提供组内平均效应置信区间、效应同质性及排序一致性检验,其有效性不依赖机器学习算法自身的性质。
阅读关注点
应核对分组目标如何定义、训练与评价样本如何安排,以及随机分组和交叉拟合产生的额外不确定性如何进入方差计算。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 OpenAlex 版本摘要;未列出完整抽样条件和有限样本保证,不应将推断有效性理解为机器学习已准确识别个体效应。

原文摘要

Researchers are increasingly turning to machine learning (ML) algorithms to investigate causal heterogeneity in randomized experiments. Despite their promise, ML algorithms may fail to accurately ascertain heterogeneous treatment effects under practical settings with many covariates and small sample size. In addition, the quantification of estimation uncertainty remains a challenge. We develop a general approach to statistical inference for heterogeneous treatment effects discovered by a generic ML algorithm. We apply the Neyman’s repeated sampling framework to a common setting, in which researchers use an ML algorithm to estimate the conditional average treatment effect and then divide the sample into several groups based on the magnitude of the estimated effects. We show how to estimate the average treatment effect within each of these groups, and construct a valid confidence interval. In addition, we develop nonparametric tests of treatment effect homogeneity across groups, and rank-consistency of within-group average treatment effects. The validity of our methodology does not rely on the properties of ML algorithms because it is solely based on the randomization of treatment assignment and random sampling of units. Finally, we generalize our methodology to the cross-fitting procedure by accounting for the additional uncertainty induced by the random splitting of data.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文