跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究有限总体抽样与一般充分性理论,未明确涉及所列计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
V. P. Godambe

有限总体抽样的新方法(二):分布无关充分性

研究问题
当有限总体抽样中的先验知识可表示为一类先验分布时,如何将线性充分性扩展为适用于全部估计量的充分性?
方法与思路
作者取消原有充分性定义的线性限制,定义分布无关充分性,并研究总体总量估计量及两种充分性之间的关系。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称前篇的某个线性总量估计量也满足扩展后的充分性准则;限制在线性估计量类内时,两种充分性一致。
阅读关注点
应核对先验分布类如何进入充分性定义、特定总量估计量的形式,以及线性与分布无关充分性等价的精确范围。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;前篇定义、估计量形式及先验分布类限制未提供,不能将结果理解为无条件充分性。

原文摘要

Summary The idea that in some situations the prior knowledge about the unknown parameters could be formulated as a class of prior distributions, which could be used, not necessarily through Bayes posterior probability, for subsequent inference, is already present in Godambe (1955). In the present paper, the concept of distribution-free linear sufficiency or in short linear sufficiency, originally due to Barnard (1963b) but redefined by the present author (Part I), is extended by defining distribution-free sufficiency, removing the restriction of linearity. This extension again is based on the assumption that in some situations prior knowledge could be formulated as a class of prior distributions. A certain linear estimator of the population total, which in Part I was shown to satisfy the redefined criteria of linear sufficiency uniquely in the class of all linear estimators, is now shown to satisfy this extended criteria of distribution-free sufficiency in the entire class of estimators. Further the general relationship between the linear sufficiency of Part I and the distribution-free sufficiency introduced here is investigated. Broadly the result is that, if we restrict to linear estimators only, distribution-free sufficiency is identical with linear sufficiency. Finally, some remarks are offered by way of comparison between the result obtained by the author previously (Godambe, 1955) and the result here, about the utilization of the prior information. The approach of this paper clearly implies a generalization of Fisherian sufficiency suitable for the situations when prior knowledge consists of a class of prior distributions. An alternative generalization when the prior knowledge consists of a group structure is due to Barnard (1963a).

笔记与分组
相关领域论文