跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦复杂调查抽样和加权推断,聚类抽样并不等同于面板数据,缺乏所列经济、金融方向的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

“Equivalent Sample Size” and “Equivalent Degrees of Freedom” Refinements for Inference Using Survey Weights under Superpopulation Models

超总体模型下调查加权推断的等效样本量与等效自由度修正

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Max A. Woodbury
Kenneth G. Manton

超总体模型下调查加权推断的等效样本量与等效自由度修正

研究问题
在具有不等权重的复杂调查设计中,如何调整超总体模型的方差估计、检验和置信区间以反映设计效应?
方法与思路
作者将权重重标度至等效样本量,再通过等效自由度细化推断,并讨论聚类、分层、后分层及相关检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,这些近似程序能考虑权重所表达的设计效应,并比将权重简单调整至样本量具有更充分的依据。
阅读关注点
应核对设计效应和等效自由度的定义与估计、超总体条件,以及不同抽样设计下近似区间和检验的校准。
阅读边界
摘要未说明设计效应估计误差及近似推断的全部条件,不能认定适用于任意调查设计;索引版本与刊本变化未知。

原文摘要

A number of procedures have been proposed to attack different inference problems for data drawn from a survey with a complex sample design (i.e., a design that entails unequal weighting). Most procedures either are based on finite-population assumptions or require the specification of an explicit model using a superpopulation rationale. Herein we propose some relatively simple approximate procedures that are based on a superpopulation model. They provide valid variance estimators, test statistics, and confidence intervals that allow for sample design effects as expressed by design weights and other weights. The procedures do not rely on conditioning on model elements such as covariates to adjust for design effects. Instead, we obtain estimators by rescaling sample weights to sum to the equivalent sample size (equal to sample size divided by design effect). Using weighted estimators for superpopulation models, we obtain approximations to confidence bounds on the mean for simple sampling situations as well as for cluster sampling, post-stratification, and stratified sampling. We also obtain approximate tests of hypotheses for one-way analysis of variance and k × 2 homogeneity testing. For all of these, further refinements based on the concept of equivalent degrees of freedom are provided. Additionally, a general method for determining and using poststratification weights is described and illustrated. The procedures in this article are better justified than the common expedient of making proportional adjustments so that the weights add to the sample size.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文