跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将序列相关与 ARCH 诊断应用于 Fama–French 三因子资产定价模型。

反馈分类问题

Multivariate residual‐based finite‐sample tests for serial dependence and ARCH effects with applications to asset pricing models

多元残差的有限样本序列相关与 ARCH 检验:资产定价应用

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Lynda Khalaf

多元残差的有限样本序列相关与 ARCH 检验:资产定价应用

研究问题
在多元线性回归中,如何检验序列相关和 ARCH 效应,使检验不受误差协方差影响,并允许可能非正态的误差?
方法与思路
作者标准化多元残差,构造集总诊断的有限样本版本,并用蒙特卡洛检验方法合并跨方程检验,避免 Bonferroni 型界。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称所提检验在模拟中具有良好尺寸和功效;三因子模型应用显示,允许非正态后子期间误差设定较可接受,全样本存在不稳定。
阅读关注点
应核对标准化如何实现不变性、有限样本精确性的分布条件,以及蒙特卡洛合并规则、模拟对照和子期间划分依据。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 Crossref 版本摘要;精确性成立的完整条件及数值指标未说明,不能推断对任意误差分布有效或其他版本变化。

原文摘要

Abstract In this paper, we propose several finite‐sample specification tests for multivariate linear regressions (MLR). We focus on tests for serial dependence and ARCH effects with possibly non‐Gaussian errors. The tests are based on properly standardized multivariate residuals to ensure invariance to error covariances. The procedures proposed provide: (i) exact variants of standard multivariate portmanteau tests for serial correlation as well as ARCH effects, and (ii) exact versions of the diagnostics presented by Shanken ( 1990 ) which are based on combining univariate specification tests. Specifically, we combine tests across equations using a Monte Carlo (MC) test method so that Bonferroni‐type bounds can be avoided. The procedures considered are evaluated in a simulation experiment: the latter shows that standard asymptotic procedures suffer from serious size problems, while the MC tests suggested display excellent size and power properties, even when the sample size is small relative to the number of equations, with normal or Student‐ t errors. The tests proposed are applied to the Fama–French three‐factor model. Our findings suggest that the i.i.d. error assumption provides an acceptable working framework once we allow for non‐Gaussian errors within 5‐year sub‐periods, whereas temporal instabilities clearly plague the full‐sample dataset. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文